<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:49:49 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Sebastian Bergmann's Blog: PHPUnit Support in PHP IDEs]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4870</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4870</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<i>Sebastian Bergmann</i> has <a href="http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/blog/archives/576-PHPUnit-Support-in-PHP-IDEs.html">a new post</a> on his blog today that mentions the ever-growing demand he's seeing for the intergration of PHPUnit into the numerous PHP IDEs out there (such as <a href="http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/blog/archives/575-PHPEclipse.html">PHPEclipse</a>).
<p>
<quote>
<i>
I offered the PHPEclipse development team help in developing proper support for PHPUnit in the past, to no avail so far. I also talked to the developers of Zend Studio about PHPUnit support for their IDE. Hopefully the next version will support it, we'll see.
<p>
Over the last couple of years I did several presentations at conferences as well as workshops, consultings and trainings on PHPUnit where I was asked by developers who are using PHPUnit (to test business critical banking applications, for instance) why I do not support any IDE. My answer to this has been, and still is, that while I develop PHPUnit I don't have the time, and in the case of Zend Studio, for instance, not even the means, to integrate it into IDEs. For this I depend on the support of the IDE vendors.
</i>
</quote>
<p>
He <a href="http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/blog/archives/576-PHPUnit-Support-in-PHP-IDEs.html">also mentions</a> that if there are any of the IDE developers out there that would like to help him on the matter, to let him know...]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 07:29:51 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[John Cox's Blog:  Long List of PHP IDEs]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4341</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4341</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<i>John Cox</i> today has <a href='http://wyome.com/index.php?module=articles&func=display&ptid=10&aid=479">this new post</a> today with a reminder about the PHPEditors <a href="http://www.php-editors.com/review">list of IDEs</a> (with reviews) they have posted.
<p>
<quote>
<i>
I have used <a href="http://www.editplus.com/">Edit Plus</a> for at least three years, but more than likely longer for my development purposes. I have no real reason why I like it other than I am used to it, and being used to something seems to help my productivity.
<p>
<a href="http://www.php-editors.com/">PHP Editors</a> has a <a href="http://www.php-editors.com/review">very long list of other IDEs reviewed and with comments</a> which might come in handy for those that have no loyalty to one product or another. It looks like <a href="http://www.mpsoftware.dk/phpdesigner.php">PHP Designer</a> leads the list of favorite software packages.
</i>
</quote>
<p>
I'm an <a href="http://www.editplus.com/">Edit Plus</a> fan too, but some of the reviews on some of these other packages are making me wonder about my choice of editor too. There are a few features that I with Edit Plus had, but I've lived without them so far. I have <a href="http://www.pixelated-dreams.com">friends</a> that swear by the Zend IDE and the like, but I just feel more like those are like shooting a mouse with a cannon...]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 06:09:02 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
