<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:37:50 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[International PHP Magazine: Poll Question: What Is the Best Way to Do QA for PHP?]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/7977</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/7977</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
The results from the <a href="http://www.php-mag.net/magphpde/magphpde_news/psecom,id,27291,nodeid,5.html">latest poll</a> conducted by the International PHP Magazine have been released. This time, they asked developers what they thought was the best way to do QA for their PHP applications.
</p>
<p>
Among the options were things like "Do API documentation", "Use code analyzers that check CS violations, XSS or SQL injection attacks" and the number one choice - "Do unit tests using PHPUnit or phpt". Three other options followed behind (using debugging tools, code analyzers and having a commit mailing list) with the API documentation falling down in last place.
</p>
<p>
They already started up <a href="http://www.php-mag.net/magphpde/magphpde_news/psecom,id,27290,nodeid,5.html">this week's poll</a> too. This time, they ask developers to vote on which of the options make for good PHP code. There's four options - structured, consistent, portable and secure. <a href="http://www.php-mag.net/magphpde/magphpde_news/psecom,id,27290,nodeid,5.html">Get your vote in today!</a>
</p>
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:41:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
