<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 15:46:15 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Chris Hartjes' Blog: 10 Days Later - Early Impressions of CakePHP vs. CodeIgniter]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/8971</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/8971</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
<i>Chris Hartjes</i>, after spending ten days (a week-ish) working with <a href="http://codeigniter/">CodeIgniter</a>, has <a href="http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard/2007/11/02/10-days-later-early-impressions-of-cakephp-vs-codeigniter/">posted some of his thoughts</a> comparing the framework to one he likes just a bit more, <a href="http://www.cakephp.org">CakePHP</a>.
</p>
<blockquote>
As loyal readers to my blog know, my <a href="http://www.xmlteam.com/">employer</a> has committed to using <a href="http://codeigniter/>CodeIgniter</a> for projects, although I hold out hope that new projects with my beloved <a href="http://www.cakephp.org/">CakePHP</a>. That's okay, I'm a big boy and can handle working with different things as clients (and bosses) demand. So, after maybe a week and a bit of working with CodeIgniter I thought I'd talk about it.
</blockquote>
<p>
He's broken it down into a series of bullet-points to summarize the experience (there's explanations under each too):
</p>
<ul>
<li>Once you know one MVC framework, you know them all
<li>CodeIgniter mixes OOP and functions
<li>Lack of conventions makes Chris sad
<li>CodeIgniter's User Guide Is Awesome
<li>No built-in associative data mapping makes Chris sad
</ul>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:19:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
