<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 03:32:06 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Tectonic.co.za: PHP is dead. Long live PHP!]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/5843</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/5843</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
In <a href="http://www.tectonic.co.za/view.php?src=rss&id=1064">this post</a> from <i>Jason Norwood-Young</i>, he shares his opinions on the lifespan of PHP - that maybe, just maybe, PHP has passed its prime.
</p>
<blockquote>
<p>
A friend recently told me that PHP is on its way out, Ruby on Rails is where it's at. I scoffed. I chuckled. Then I gave it some thought. Could PHP have had its day?
</p>
<p>
[After my research] I have to conclude that my friend might be right in one respect - PHP has had its day. If the trend continues, it means that PHP will one day not be the hottest thing on the web like it is right now.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
He's not <a href="http://www.tectonic.co.za/view.php?src=rss&id=1064">abandoning ship</a> just yet, though - he notes that:
</p>
<blockquote>
PHP still has plenty of legs, and it will take quite a bit to wind it. I'm not sure what will take its place, but somehow I don't think Ruby on Rails will be the successor. PHP's advantage over the rest is that it's a web application, through and through. It doesn't try to also be a desktop application language, a server application language, a widget application language... it just spits out web pages fast and efficiently.
</blockquote>
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 05:53:53 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
