<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 12:00:24 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[John Cox's Blog:  Loud Thoughts on Zend Framework]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4431</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4431</link>
      <description><![CDATA[On his blog, <i>John Cox</i> has a <a href="http://wyome.com/index.php?module=articles&func=display&ptid=10&aid=487">few opinions of his own</a> pertaining to the Zend Framework and <a href="http://www.loudthinking.com/arc/000544.html">this Loud Thinking post</a>.
<p>
<quote>
<i>
I have stayed away from commenting on the Zend Framework, as I may or may not have some use for it via <a href="http://www.xaraya.com/">Xaraya</a> in the background. There's plenty of room for more frameworks, as each that is out there now has advantages and disadvantages. However, I couldn't resist pointing out this remark from <a href="http://www.loudthinking.com/arc/000544.html">Loud Thinking</a> as it does cut through some of the propaganda of "extreme ease".
<p>
Interesting thoughts on the design process, which I hope won't fall on deaf ears.
</i>
</quote>
<p>
He quotes a bit from the Loud Thinking post, highlighting some of the comments made about the Zend development process and how it might be headed down a less-productive path focusing on use cases and sample apps...]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 07:09:05 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
