<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:31:10 -0600</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Community News: Has Smarty's Time Come?]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/9407</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/9407</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
As <i>Paul Jones</i> <a href="http://paul-m-jones.com/?p=273">mentions</a>, there's a sort of force in the PHP community that seems to be pushing back at the <a href="http://smarty.php.net">Smarty templating system</a> and calling it unnecessary. 
</p>
<p>
He points out <a href="http://hasin.wordpress.com/2008/01/05/once-upon-a-time-there-was-smarty/">Hasin Hayder's post</a> on the subject. <i>Hasin</i> (ironically author of a Smarty book) has recently come to the conclusion that there "is no need to use an external template engine like smarty".
</p>
<blockquote>
Some nice guys over there developed smarty and it saved life of a lot of developers (i mean developers). But that time is over. Seriously why the hell I need to learn a new templating language when a "echo" does the thing much better.
</blockquote>
<p>
Judging by the responses to both <a href="http://hasin.wordpress.com/2008/01/05/once-upon-a-time-there-was-smarty/">Hasin's post</a> and <a href="http://paul-m-jones.com/?p=273">Paul's post</a> it seems like quite a bit of the PHP community agrees (including <a href="http://fosterburgess.com/kimsal/?p=406">Michael Kimsal</a>, <a href="http://www.phppatterns.com/index.php/article/articleview/4/1/1/">Harry Fuecks</a> and <a href="http://www.massassi.com/php/articles/template_engines/">Brian Lozier</a>). 
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:53:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
