<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 09:18:16 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[ReadWriteWeb.com: CONFIRMED: Facebook Gets Faster, Debuts Homegrown PHP Compiler]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/13951</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/13951</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
If you've been following along with some of <a href="http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/13941">the articles</a> about the compiler Facebook is developing for PHP, you might want to check out <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_gets_faster_debuts_homegrown_php_compiler.php">these comments</a> from ReadWriteWeb.com (by <i>Mike Melanson</i>) with more from his point of view.
</p>
<blockquote>
According to our sources, Facebook has been working on a PHP compiler that will increase speed by around 80% and offer a just-in-time (JIT) compilation engine that will offer a number of advantages. The project is very similar to Google's <a href="http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/google-launches-project-to-boost-python-performance-by-5x.ars">Unladen Swallow</a> project, which rebuilt the Python compiler, boosting the speed fivefold and opening the door for multi-language integration.
</blockquote>
<p>
Included are also some comments from <a href="http://twitter.com/rcrowley">Richard Crowley</a> about what Facebook could be releasing, a compiler that would still allow PHP to remain interpreted but provide the speed of being compiled. Some of the <A href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_gets_faster_debuts_homegrown_php_compiler.php#comments">comments</a> on the post wonder how something like this compiler compares to an opcode cache and doubts on whether it will end up being open sourced at all.
</p>
<p>
You can also get another opinion on what will be released in <a href="http://www.allfacebook.com/2010/02/facebook-prepares-to-open-source-a-new-php/">this article</a> from the All Facebook blog. They reinforce that the announcement will come today and how much potential something like this could have to change what PHP could become.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:45:12 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Phil Sturgeon's Blog: CodeIgniter "2.0": Rumours, facts and requests]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/13468</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/13468</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
In <A href="http://philsturgeon.co.uk/news/2009/10/CodeIgniter-2.0-Rumours-facts-and-requests">this new post</a> to his blog today <i>Phil Sturgeon</i> takes on some of the rumors that have been floating around about a version 2.0 of the CodeIgniter framework.
</p>
<blockquote>
Ever since it was announced that ExpressionEngine 2.0 would be running on CodeIgniter, the forums have been jammed full of "CodeIgniter 2.0" questions. I have answer this so many times I wanted to clear things up. [...] I figured, instead of just ranting about it, I could use this oppertunity to discuss what is, what is not and what should be going into CodeIgniter over the next few versions. 
</blockquote>
<p>
He breaks up things into four categories - confirmed features, missing features, minor syntax changes and a "crazy but helpful" section.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:12:45 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Chris Hartjes' Blog: CakePHP Mythbusters!]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/11668</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/11668</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
In an effort to dispel some of the rumors and myths around the CakePHP framework (as presented most recently by <a href="http://www.isolani.co.uk/blog/web/PhpFrameworksComparingCakePhpAndSymfony">a different blogger</a>) <i>Chris Hartjes</i> has <a href="http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard/2009/01/04/cakephp-mythbusters/">made a new "mythbuster" post</a> to his blog today with a rebuttal to the points from the other article.
</p>
<blockquote>
I ran across an article comparing CakePHP and Symfony and found that the writer had a number of preconceived ideas about CakePHP. These same ideas keep popping up everywhere, used by people looking to get their hate on about CakePHP. I sent a very well-reasoned email to the writer clearing up some of those misconceptions [...] So, in the interest of clarifying things about CakePHP I thought I would share that email, slightly rewritten for this blog posting, but the content is roughly the same. 
</blockquote>
<p>
The <a href="http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard/2009/01/04/cakephp-mythbusters/">post/email</a> covers a few different topics some might have misconceptions about concerning the framework:
</p>
<ul>
<li>Lack of Documentation
<li>Scaffolding
<li>Models are tied to controllers in a 1:1 relationship
<li>Cake's Ajax and Javascript helpers do not support graceful degradation
<li>Cake's HTML and Form helpers produces bad markup
<li>Unit tests are an afterthought
<li>CakePHP is not an "enterprise capable framework"
</ul>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:47:16 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Community News: Andi Gutmans Responds to Zend Acquisition Rumors]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/10238</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/10238</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
As <a href="http://www.jansch.nl/2008/05/21/andi-gutmans-phptek-response-to-the-layoffs/">mentioned</a> by <i>Ivo Jansch</i>, <i>Andi Gutmans</i> (of <a href="http://www.zend.com">Zend</a>) responded to the <a href="http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/10217">recent speculation</a> about a buyout of the company in his keynote address at this year's php|tek conference:
</p>
<blockquote>
Andi explained the reason: they want to become cashflow positive, in order to remain independent. The news should be interpreted in a positive way, the future now looks bright, Zend products will not be affected and life goes on. An acquisition of Zend is not happening in the near future.
</blockquote>
<p>
TechCrunch had suggested that the recent large amounts of layoffs could have been in an effort to ready the company for a buy out from one of many proposed major players.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 15:24:56 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Richard Davey's Blog: PHP Life - The Oracle]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4848</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4848</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<i>Richard Davey</i> has brought his PHP-centered comic, "PHP Life", back to life with <a href="http://www.corephp.co.uk/archives/29-PHP-Life-The-Oracle.html">this new strip</a> about the Zend/Oracle rumors.
<p>
<quote>
<i>
After a short break the PHP Life team are back. In this strip we look at the Zend/Oracle deal. If Oracle do buy-out Zend then let's hope things fare better for the Zend staff than Oracle staff at the moment!
</i>
</quote>
<p>
You can see it <a href="http://www.corephp.co.uk/archives/29-PHP-Life-The-Oracle.html">here</a> (on his blog), or on <a href="http://www.phplife.org/">the PHP Life site</a>...]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:14:23 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Christian Wenz's Blog: Zend and Oracle, again]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4844</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4844</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<i>Christian Wenz</i> has posted <a href="http://www.hauser-wenz.de/s9y/index.php?/archives/159-Zend-and-Oracle,-again.html">this new item</a> on his blog today with a report relating to the Oracle/Zend rumors that have been floating around.
<p>
<quote>
<i>
Well, the <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/feb2006/tc20060209_810527.htm">rumors</a> (that also made it into blogosphere, including <a href="http://www.schlitt.info/applications/blog/index.php?/archives/416-Will-Oracle-buy-Zend.html">Toby's post</a>) obviously could not be ignored by Zend any longer. Therefore, the German division of Zend just sent out an email to a couple of people officially stating that Zend is currently not negotiating a sale to Oracle.
</i>
</quote>
<p>
I suppose only time will tell on the deal, but it seems for now that the sale is not going to happen (and that there never was a sale in talks at all).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:46:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
