<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:43:05 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[P&aacute;draic Brady's Blog: Filter Extension Issues - A Storm in a Teacup?]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/6684</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/6684</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
Responding to the recent comments about the filter extension included in recent PHP 5 releases from other members of the community, <i>P&aacute;draic Brady</i> has posted <a href="http://blog.quantum-star.com/index.php?/archives/246-Filter-Extension-Issues-A-Storm-in-a-Teacup.html">comments on the matter</a> including his experience with the extension and his worry about the other comments tarnishing the extension's reputation.
</p>
<blockquote>
Personally I haven't tested ext/filter. I should no doubt be shot like a rabid dog for daring to post about this for that reason alone. Commenting idly without any knowledge of an extension is obviously illegal somewhere, possibly China.
</blockquote>
<p>
He notes that some of the comments (the more inflammatory ones) were a bit out of place, and that feedback about issues has its place - not in major public view. He <a href="http://blog.quantum-star.com/index.php?/archives/246-Filter-Extension-Issues-A-Storm-in-a-Teacup.html">worries</a> that the negative comments will cast a negative shadow on the extension and that the "back and forth" that's a result of it only serves to cause more trouble than it's worth.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:23:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
