<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:10:15 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Jonas Maurus's Blog: I'm sorry, but PHP sucks.]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4892</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4892</link>
      <description><![CDATA[With another response to <a href="http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2006/02/17/PHP">the comments</a> that <i>Tim Bray</i> made about PHP, <i>Jonas Maurus</i> has posted some of <a href="http://maurus.net/work/php-sucks/">his opinions</a> as to why PHP sucks.
<p>
<i>Jonas</i> looks first at the comments that <i>Tim</i> made, looking that the "reasons to like PHP" first (two items, according to <i>Tim</i>'s opinions) and then goes on to list six other reasons as to why PHP sucks.
<p>
Included in those reasons are things like:
<ul>
<li>There are 3 incompatible versions of PHP
<li>(string)"false" == (int)0 is true
<li>PHP isn't thread-safe
<li>The quality of PHP's compiled-in libraries differs widely
</ul>
<p>
He does <a href="http://maurus.net/work/php-sucks/">note</a>, though, that of the dynamically-typed langauges out there, PHP is the most approachable. He mentions some instances where he believes it's okay to use PHP too - along the lines of the "right tool for the job".]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:03:52 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[SitePoint PHP Blog: A pro-PHP Rant]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4881</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4881</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In a follow-up to his <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/02/20/tim-bray-on-php/">brief opinion</a> on the <i>Tim Bray</i> comments about PHP, <i>Harry Fuecks</i> has poested <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/02/21/a-pro-php-rant/">this longer rant</a> on the SitePoint PHP blog today.
<p>
He looks at eight different topics:
<ul>
<li>It's the execution model
<li>Excellent database support
<li>PHP Arrays
<li>The SPL Extension
<li>PHP 5(.1) XML Support
<li>The stuff that says it works...works
<li>Unicode and ICU
<li>Stuck in Little boxes
</ul>
<p>
For <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/02/21/a-pro-php-rant/">each of them</a> he explains them briefly, dispelling any rumors that might have come up from those not as experienced with the PHP language.
<p>
<b>Update:</b> if you'd like to help promote it, it's <a href="http://digg.com/programming/Why_PHP_doesn_t_suck.">been digged</a>.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 06:59:12 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Marcus Whitney's Blog: The PHP Argument]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4879</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4879</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<i>Marcus Whitney</i> has chimed in on <a href="http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2006/02/17/PHP">Tim Bray's comments</a> about PHP in his <a href="http://www.marcuswhitney.com/?p=66">latest blog post</a>.
<p>
<quote>
<i>
PHP has arrived. Tim Bray posted on PHP and it's got the web all hot and heavy. I know that plenty of people like to take these opportunities to flex their blog muscles and tell off all the other languages, proclaim their programming expertise and explain why all those using certain languages are dumb as hell. Greg Beaver has already done a good job of pointing out why this is a waste of time so I wont repeat what he said. 
<p>
So in short, here's the deal. PHP is getting hated on because she is the prom queen. Rails in the new contender, and Java is last year's hot stuff. All three are valuable languages that provide many an over-paid programmer with the tools needed to wow their co-workers. Pick your weapon and go to town.
</i>
</quote>
<p>
He's basically of the same concensus that <a href="http://greg.chiaraquartet.net/archives/116-My-language-is-bigger-than-your-language-so-nyah-nyah.html">others</a> <a href="http://phplens.com/phpeverywhere/?q=node/view/226">stated</a> - it's not about how good one language is overall, it's about what works for you in the situation you're in. It's almost impossible to find a langauge out there that's a perfect fit fo everything.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 06:45:17 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[SitePoint PHP Blog: Tim Bray on PHP]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4874</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4874</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<i>Harry Fuecks</i> has posted <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/02/20/tim-bray-on-php/">his brief opinion</a> on <a href="http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2006/02/17/PHP">the comments</a> that <i>Tim Bray</i> made recently about PHP over on the SitePoint PHP blog.
<p>
<quote>
<i>
Tim Bray kicked off a big blog debate on the pros and cons of PHP (see links in his post to everyone who commented). If you've been around PHP for a while, there's basically nothing new here but you might find cause for optimism in how things are being said'"there's far more informed discussion happening than you might have found even two years ago.
</i>
</quote>
<p>
<i>Harry</i> also <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/02/20/tim-bray-on-php/">mentions</a> that there's not much more he wants to add other than a comment on the "PHP is too easy" comment <i>Tim</i> made. Be sure to check out <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/02/20/tim-bray-on-php/#comments">the comments</a> on this post for some great opinions.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 06:53:06 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
