<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:43:17 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[SitePoint PHP Blog: More PHP frameworks]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/5016</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/5016</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/03/18/more-php-frameworks/">this post</a> from the SitePoint PHP Blog, <i>Harry Fuecks</i> shares information about two more framework systems for PHP - <a href="http://tonic.sourceforge.net/">Tonic</a> and <a href="http://www.codeigniter.com/">Code Igniter</a>.
<p>
<quote>
<i>
Yes I know'"with the framework in progress, we don't need no more stinkin' frameworks. Except there's a couple I've seen recently which are noteworthy. I haven't delved into the source code in any depth'"exploring framework code bases has become as much fun as watching paint dry, but there are some interesting ideas here, if you're looking to new angles on the problem.
</i>
</quote>
<p>
The "new angles" he mentions are:
<ul>
<li>For <a href="http://tonic.sourceforge.net/">Tonic</a>, the fact that it's a "RESTful" environment and feels like <a href="http://webpy.org/">web.py</a> in its development
<li>And for <a href="http://www.codeigniter.com/">Code Igniter</a>, because it has a "Rails-esque" with an interesting approach to URL mapping.
</ul>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 07:16:54 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
