<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 22:44:18 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[SitePoint PHP Blog: Which reference sites do you trust?]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/8559</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/8559</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
The SitePoint PHP blog has a <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/08/28/which-reference-sites-do-you-trust/">post that asks developers</a> "Which reference sites do you trust?"
</p>
<blockquote>
While completing the tech edit on the <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/books/phpant2/">2nd edition of the PHP Anthology</a> the issue of linking came up; specifically, linking to authoritative reference material on the web. [...] The issue isn't simple one. Regarding PHP, the <a href="http://www.php.net/docs.php">php.net manual</a> is the authoritative reference site. The various web technology standards are also represented by authority web sites.
</blockquote>
<p>
So what does he thing makes for a good, trustworthy resource? <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/08/28/which-reference-sites-do-you-trust/">He includes criteria</a> divided up into three sections - readability, accuracy & trustworthiness and longevity.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:43:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
