<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 06:13:05 -0600</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[PHPFreaks.com: Design Patterns - Strategy/Bridge, Value Object, Singleton (Registry)]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/11183</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/11183</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
Following up on their <a href="http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/11174">introduction to design patterns</a>, the PHP Freaks have posted tutorials covering three of the more popular patterns - strategy/bridge, value object and singleton.
</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.phpfreaks.com/tutorial/design-patterns---strategy-and-bridge">Strategy and Bridge</a> - The Strategy and Bridge patterns provide solutions to apply polymorphism in more flexible way than you can accomplish with only inheritance.
<li><a href="http://www.phpfreaks.com/tutorial/design-patterns---value-object">Value Object</a> - The Value Object pattern has, just like the Singleton, to do with referencing and instances. In a way, the Value Object is the opposite of the Singleton: it's goal is to ensure NOT to use the same instance, under certain conditions.
<li><a href="http://www.phpfreaks.com/tutorial/design-patterns---singleton-and-singleton-registry">Singleton and Singleton Registry</a> - The Singleton pattern ensures that you are always dealing with the same, single instance, wherever in your application. The Registry pattern usually utilizes the Singleton pattern (hence "Singleton Registry") to make the same 'globalness' apply to objects who's classes weren't necessarily designed to
</ul>
<p>
Keep checking back to <a href="http://www.phpfreaks.com/tutorials">their tutorials section</a> for more design pattern tutorials.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:33:10 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Knut Urdalen's Blog: ORM the manual way]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/8547</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/8547</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
<i>Knut Urdalen</i>, on seeing some of <a href="http://kore-nordmann.de/blog/why_active_record_sucks.html">the recent discussion</a> on why the ActiveRecord pattern sucks and <a href="http://www.urdalen.com/blog/?p=210">talks about</a> why, when presented with a the need for a database layer, he usually goes back to his own familiar Singleton-based style.
</p>
<blockquote>
I normally use a simple solution using the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singleton_pattern">Singleton</a> pattern for managing the database connection, the <a href="http://www.martinfowler.com/eaaCatalog/valueObject.html">Value Object</a> pattern for all business objects and the <a href="http://www.martinfowler.com/eaaCatalog/dataMapper.html">Data Mapper</a> pattern to manage the mapping between business objects and the database schema. It's as simple as that '" handcrafted and no magic going on.
</blockquote>
<p>
The <a href="http://www.urdalen.com/blog/?p=210">post also includes</a> his code for an example of a database connection - the creation of the Singleton interface class, making the Value Objects and customizing one for the type of "Product".
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 07:57:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
