<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:05:53 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Joshua Eichorn's Blog: ZActiveRecord can't work?]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4639</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4639</link>
      <description><![CDATA[On his blog today, <i>Joshua Eichorn</i> has <a href="http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/">a look</a> at the ZActiveRecord functionality that was shown off in the Zend Framework Webcast - and how it might now work as planned.
<p>
<quote>
<i>
In the webcast the following active record example was shown. This looks nice and slick but I don't see how its possible, at least in php 5.1. There is no way to get the class name of the child in in the find all method.
<p>
Anyone have a clue on how Zend is planning to get around this problem. From what I can tell its impossible and I haven't seen anything on 5.1.2dev that would solve the problem but I could just be missing something and there is an easy way around the problem. To me it looks like PHP forces you to do a none static activerecord implmentation.
</i>
</quote>
<p>
There are a few <a href="http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/">updates to his post</a> and some comments with more to say on the topic - including pointing out that it's more of a PHP bug than just a ZActiveRecord issue...]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:22:55 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
