 | News Feed |
 | Jobs Feed |
Sections
|
| feed this: |  |
Symfony Blog: Updates to the Plugin Website/Resources
by Chris Cornutt August 11, 2008 @ 08:45:08
Two new posts on the Symfony blog talk about improvements to the framework's plugin system (as found in recent releases).
A week after the release of the new plugin system, a lot of activity has taken place. More than 30 plugins were created, and 51 new releases were published on 27 different plugins. Based on the feedback I have received from the community, I have made some tweaks to the system.
These tweaks include a newly designed homepage, the inclusion of RSS feeds and a special URL to view the older wiki documentation for some plugins.
The second post describes more enhancements based on other feedback (on the previous post). Updates based on this information include an new "overview" field to describe the plugin, a download of the Markdown syntax to make the documentation conversion easier and a "stric mode" validation if you upload a PEAR package.
voice your opinion now!
symfony framework website update feedback functionality
Alan Knowles' Blog: Licence to release PHP code?
by Chris Cornutt March 28, 2008 @ 11:10:37
A little while back, Alan Knowles wondered something that I'm sure has crosses the mind of every PHP developer out there, especially when they came across a particularly bad chunk of code - some people should need to apply for a license before releasing their PHP code out into the wild.
Unlike most of the reviews you get, I was specifically looking at code quality [of the CMSs]. not fuzzy does it look nice!
He looks at a whole list of them including: Tanslucis, Siteman, Pivot, jaf-cms, Guppy, Doop and CutePHP. Unfortunately, most of the news is bad - between badly structured code and mixes of HTML and PHP, there was almost nothing good in any of them.
voice your opinion now!
license release cms good bad ugly structure functionality
Stubbles Blog: Traits for PHP
by Chris Cornutt February 20, 2008 @ 11:17:00
On the Stubbles blog, Frank Kleine has pointed out a proposal from Stefan Marr to include functionality for traits in PHP.
As a language construct within PHP it would be very easy to do the same, but easier to learn and to use. Beside some keyword issues (the RFC uses "use" as keyword, but this will of course conflict with namespaces) I'm wondering what this will have an impact on reflection - the RFC stays unclear about this.
A trait is a free-floating chink of functionality that, instead of being confined to a class (or file) that has to be called on to use it, exists where the developer can use it from anywhere at any time. This helps solve some of the issues with single inheritance in PHP.
voice your opinion now!
trait language functionality independent proposal rfc
PHPWACT.org: Handling UTF-8 with PHP
by Chris Cornutt January 24, 2008 @ 07:51:00
Ed Finkler has pointed out a handy resource for those trying to cope with using the UTF-8 support included in several of PHP's functions - this page on the Web Application Component Toolkit wiki.
This page is intended as a reference for functionality PHP provides which can either help with handling UTF-8 or should be regarded as a risk when used in conjunction with UTF-8 encoded strings. Further information can be found on the Internationalization (I18N) and Character Sets / Character Encoding Issues pages.
It talks about the "dangerous" functionality PHP has (issues that the language has in current functions) when using things like the PCRE extension, the string extension, the array methods, handling variables, the XML extensions (DOM and SAX), image manipulation, and URL parsing functionality.
voice your opinion now!
utf8 dangerous functionality pcre xml string array image url
Padraic Brady's Blog: Ruby Testing Tools Missing From PHP
by Chris Cornutt November 28, 2007 @ 08:48:00
In this post from Padraic Brady, he compares some of the tools that are available to Ruby developers to some of their counterparts (if they exist) in PHP.
Anyways, here's the pitch. I've been using Ruby for a year now and my pet peeves with PHP started getting a bit too much to comfortably endure. [...] I don't like developing web applications with Ruby, or that thing Rails. Whatever it is. It's a framework, right? So I'm on a splurge of writing PHP tools for the same things in cahoots with folk like Travis Swicegood.
Tools he mentions include Autotest, Mutation testing, Mocha, Rspec, Heckle and some of their PHP counterparts like parts in PHPUnit and the DomDocument functionality.
voice your opinion now!
ruby testing missing functionality phpunit ruby testing missing functionality phpunit
Mike Lively's Blog: Late static binding....sorta /
by Chris Cornutt September 27, 2007 @ 12:58:00
Mike Lively is happy about one thing - that late static binding (definition) has been committed and will be included with PHP 5.3. Unfortunately, he has a downside too:
The good news is late static binding has been introduced into head and looks like it will be merged into 5.3 before it is released. The horrible news is I really don't think the patch went as far as it needs to.
He talks about the original intention of the functionality (flexible inheritance for static methods/properties/constants) and how it was implemented, but with one small issue - that "static will ALWAYS return the 'resolved' name of the class used to call the current function". He illustrates with a code example showing an extended class returning a static property.
He also mentions two suggestions to help fix this issue:
- setting the behavior of parent:: such that it forwards the calling class through the next function call.
- introducing another scope [...] using a new keyword so parent:: could remain the same
voice your opinion now!
late static binding patch missing functionality parent inheritance late static binding patch missing functionality parent inheritance
|
Community Events
Don't see your event here? Let us know!
|